It’s a persistent myth about college admissions that getting in is mostly about optimizing a formula—many families assume that the right number of APs, the right leadership titles, a flashy internship, a standout passion project, and a rigorous summer program will translate into an acceptance.
But the “holistic review” that has become ubiquitous in admissions processes at top schools entails a far more nuanced criteria. Admissions committees are reading for authenticity, depth, and fit, just as much as they are evaluating academic prowess, leadership skills, and intellectual curiosity. Excelling within this admissions landscape requires a diversity of data-backed insights and insider expertise. Too often, students assume that simply knowing what admissions officers are looking for will be enough, but evaluating an application isn’t the same as crafting one. Applicants need to benefit from the perspectives of those who have navigated the process themselves and those who have evaluated it from the other side of the table.
At Command Education, our pioneering mentorship model brings together the invaluable expertise from both sides of the admissions process: the evaluator’s view, from former admissions officers, and the builder’s view, from Ivy League mentors who guide students week-to-week.
Below, VP of Mentorship Support Jane shares insights about how Command Education’s unique mentorship model equips students with the most comprehensive view of the admissions process.




