A: We do have Senior Mentors who have worked in admissions offices at top schools; however, the essential expertise our Senior Mentors bring to the consulting process does not come primarily from reading applications, but from crafting them.
The seismic shifts of the last few years have led to greater transparency than ever before regarding admissions considerations, meaning that former admissions officers are no longer the only individuals who are privy to the particular considerations that matter to admissions committees. For instance, the lawsuit against Harvard revealed that admissions officers rate students on a scale of 1–6 (with 1 being the most desirable score) on the basis of their academic, extracurricular, athletic, and personal skill sets, as well as the strengths of their recommendations and their interview. Each individual reviewer’s scores are combined with others’ into a cumulative rating, which is the most critical factor in a student’s overall evaluation. Likewise, the results of the study that led to Dartmouth’s reinstatement of their standardized testing policy revealed that the submission of standardized test scores often benefits applicants, even if the scores do not align with students’ perceptions of what a “high” or “good” score is.
Finally, we rely on our years of experience mentoring students who have gotten into their dream schools—we look at the clubs they were involved in, the independent projects they built, the recommendations they secured, and the anecdotes they shared in their essays to identify the particular strengths of successful applications. Our results are the greatest asset we have to have to offer—we know firsthand what works, and we bring that knowledge to each family who works with us.